Thus, patients that produce excessive cytokines and T cells can die from injury not only to the lungs but also to other organs such as the heart and kidneys. Because the majority of people recover from coronavirus infection , it is likely that a vaccine that triggers neutralizing antibodies and T cells to block the virus from getting into the cells and replicate is likely to be successful. Additionally, in patients who transition to a more severe form such as ARDS and cytokine storm, which is often lethal, there is an urgent need for novel anti-inflammatory drugs.
These drugs can broadly suppress the cytokine storm without causing excessive suppression of immune response, thereby enabling the patients to clear the coronavirus without damage to the lung and other tissues. There may be only a narrow window of opportunity during which these immunosuppressive agents can be effectively used.
Such agents should not be started at an early stage of infection when the patient needs the immune system to fight the infection, but it cannot be delayed too long after ARDS development, when the massive inflammation is uncontrollable. This window of anti-inflammatory treatment can be determined by monitoring the antibody and cytokine levels in patients. This means a strong immune response in phase 1 to clear the primary coronavirus infection and inhibit its spread in the lungs.
Vaccines and anti-inflammatory treatments need to carefully manage this delicate balancing act to be successful. Portsmouth Climate Festival — Portsmouth, Portsmouth. Edition: Available editions United Kingdom. Become an author Sign up as a reader Sign in. Biologist and theorist Edward O. Wilson, who is known for his studies of ants and bees that have yielded insights into human existence, has shown that our evolution from tribal into a global society increasingly favors compassionate and cooperative over callous and competitive approaches to human interaction.
David Sloan Wilson and Edward O. The Wilsons are not saying that selfishness, ruthlessness, and meanness play no part in evolution or reality; instead, they contend that compassion, altruism, generosity, and cooperation play greater roles. If you overlay their logic onto sports teams, local communities and nations, both Darwin and the Wilsons are arguing that groups made up self-interested people will fail more than they succeed.
The members of the selfish group are looking out only for themselves, and if others in their group fall, they see it as strengthening their own survival within it: One less competitor to worry about. Attenborough D. Life on earth. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; Banet E, Ayuso GE. Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. Int J Sci Edu ;— Bardapurkar A. A critical review of the causal structure of student explanations.
Evo Edu Outreach. Bartov H. Can students be taught to distinguish between teleological and causal explanations? Teaching students to understand the advantages and disadvantages of teleological and anthropomorphic statements in biology.
Beardsley PM. Middle school student learning in evolution: are current standards achievable? Am Biol Teach. Bell G. The basics of selection. Selection: the mechanism of evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Evolution and creationism in America's classrooms: a national portrait.
PLoS Biol. Evolution by natural selection: a teaching module Occasional Paper No. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching; Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Bizzo NMV. From Down House landlord to Brazilian high school students: what has happened to evolutionary knowledge on the way? Bloom P, Weisberg DS.
Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. CAS Google Scholar. Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory.
Sci Educ. Brumby M. Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. J Biol Educ. Brumby MN. Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Burkhardt RW. The inspiration of Lamarck's belief in evolution. J Hist Biol. The spirit of system. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; Chinsamy A, Plaganyi E.
Accepting evolution. How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. Corsi P. The age of Lamarck. Berkeley: University of California Press; Coyne JA. Selling Darwin. Creedy LJ. Student understanding of natural selection. Res Sci Educ. Curry A. Creationist beliefs persist in Europe. Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild. Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.
London: John Murray; Darwin, C. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. Darwin C, Wallace AR. On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Proc Linn Soc. What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topic? Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison.
Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution.
Dennett DC. Darwin's dangerous idea. New York: Touchstone Books; Espinasa M, Espinasa L. Losing sight of regressive evolution. Overcoming an essentialist bias: from metamorphosis to evolution. The nature of naive explanations of natural selection.
Int J Sci Educ. Firenze R. Lamarck vs. Darwin: dueling theories. Rep Natl Cent Sci Educ. Freeman S, Herron JC. Evolutionary analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; Futuyma DJ. Sunderland: Sinauer; Gelman SA. Psychological essentialism in children. Trends Cogn Sci.
Reinventing natural selection. Gould SJ. Shades of Lamarck. In: The Panda's Thumb. New York: Norton; Greene ED. The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. Gregory TR. Evolution as fact, theory, and path. The evolution of complex organs.
Artificial selection and domestication: modern lessons from Darwin's enduring analogy. Hall BK, Hallgrimsson B. Strickberger's evolution. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; The evolution of the species: pupil perspectives and school perspectives. Halloun IA, Hestenes D. The initial knowledge state of college physics students.
Am J Phys. Hillis DM. Making evolution relevant and exciting to biology students. Humphreys J. The laws of Lamarck. Lamarck and the general theory of evolution. Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Jeffery WR. Adaptive evolution of eye degeneration in the Mexican blind cavefish. J Heredity.
Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Changes in students' understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. Thinking about theories or thinking with theories? Selection or adjustment? Explanations of university biology students for natural selection problems. In: Novak, JD. Ithaca: Department of Education, Cornell University; ;— Managing evolving fish stocks.
Jungwirth E. The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education. Preconceived adaptation and inverted evolution. Aust Sci Teachers J. Should natural phenomena be described teleologically or anthropomorphically? Kampourakis K, Zogza V. Sci Edu ;— Preliminary evolutionary explanations: a basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution.
Kardong KV. An introduction to biological evolution. Boston: McGraw Hill; Children's beliefs about inherited characteristics. Kelemen D. Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Dev Psychol. Function, goals and intention: children's teleological reasoning about objects. Kelemen D, Rosset E. The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Keown D. Teaching evolution: improved approaches for unprepared students.
Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Natural history museum visitors' understanding of evolution. Mayr E. The growth of biological thought. What evolution Is. New York: Basic Books; Undergraduates' understanding of evolution: ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning.
Nehm RH, Reilly L. Biology majors' knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools?
J Sci Teach Educ. Does the segregation of evolution in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students' faulty mental models of biology and evolution?
Nelson CE. Teaching evolution effectively: a central dilemma and alternative strategies. Teaching evolution and all of biology more effectively: strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. Integr Comp Biol. Packard AS. Lamarck, the founder of evolution: his life and work with translations of his writings on organic evolution.
New York: Longmans, Green, and Co; Palumbi SR. Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Passmore C, Stewart J. A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students' developing understanding of biology: the case of evolution.
Eur J Psychol Educ. Pennock RT. Learning evolution and the nature of science using evolutionary computing and artificial life. What conceptions do Greek school students form about biological evolution.
Ridley M. Malden: Blackwell; Robbins JR, Roy P. Evolution and ecology of the organism. Scharmann LC. Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: the influence of a diversified instructional strategy.
Sch Sci Math. Settlage J. Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense-making process. Shtulman A. Cognit Psychol. Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Museum visitors' understanding of evolution.
Museums Soc Issues. Assessment of the teaching of evolution by natural selection through a hands-on simulation. Teach Issues Experiments Ecol. Stauffer RC editor. Charles Darwin's natural selection: being the second part of his big species book written from to Evolution: an introduction. Strevens M. The essentialist aspect of naive theories. Sundberg MD. Strategies to help students change naive alternative conceptions about evolution and natural selection.
0コメント