How is raskolnikov morally ambiguous




















I;vii; Lady Macbeth uses these quotes to push her husband beyond limits and is therefore responsible for his dramatic change in attitude. She is constantly feeding his thoughts with negative comments and later on Macbeth realizes that he has another side to him. As he moves along to discover the concealed side of him, Macbeth falls in love with himself and begins to be drawn towards his evil desires. Because Lady Macbeth was the main cause of his new hidden discovery, she is fully responsible for opening up the door and letting the darkness in.

This results in Macbeth committing both murders. The use of these two literary techniques is essential because they provide the readers with the necessary clues to realize the ultimate revelations. Their similarities are mainly evident through the significant use of the dialogues in the both stories. Slade and Mrs. While he is not a content man on the inside, he presents himself in an utterly different way. Everyone respects Proctor and recognizes him as someone not to be messed with.

However, some resent him for his bluntly honest personality. Open Document. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. Often times in literature, we are presented with quintessential characters that are all placed into the conventional categories of either good or bad.

In these pieces, we are usually able to differentiate the characters and discover their true intentions from reading only a few chapters. However, in some remarkable pieces of work, authors create characters that are so realistic and so complex that we are unable to distinguish them as purely good or evil. Raskolnikov was the most complex character in the book because of his two different sides. He could be good at times but completely evil at others.

He was faced with many difficult decisions all throughout the book which made him one of the strongest and most well developed characters. Jason Porter's Digital Portfolio. Search this site. Spanish II. Math III. Humanities III. However, Sonya knows that Raskolnikov is a killer and it would be wrong to be associated with somebody who knowingly commits sins as extravagant as murder.

Sonya is also aware that Raskolnikov has issues and his madness could drive him to do other things that could lead to even worse consequences. Sonia does tell Raskolnikov that he must turn himself in and confess his sins but she also hugs him and kisses him as to comfort him. This response leaves the reader wondering whether Sonia is doing this to help a lost soul and play her role as a saintly liberator or does her love blind her and is she simply not caring that what Raskolnikov committed was murder.

However, even though the last part of the book depicts Sonia as an accomplice to a morally wrong crime, the epilogue illustrates her as a saintly liberator. In Siberia, the image which she carried back in part one and part two of the book are stripped and she is loved by the prisoners in the camp.

Some of the dark side of history is what make a city or a country better. Knowing more about the what people did wrong in the past can inspire others to be better citizens.

The editor present some good evidence of how the early Denver was but also some of his work is not well explained and in some parts this book is repetitive. It is not justifiable to takes someone 's life, it would be no different from what criminal did.

A horrendous act being punished by yet another horrendous act is not logical. Also this law goes against the country 's constitution that we are sworn to follow. When people thought it was wrong to electrocute someone to death they simply changed their methods to a lethal injection. They made it seem that at least they died peacefully to make public more acceptable over it. Essays Essays FlashCards. Browse Essays. Sign in. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. Show More. Read More.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000