I've done this once before under different circumstances on different hardware and I seem to recall the entire process taking a couple hours. Well, reiserfsck has been running, as of this posting, for 29 hours and is not done.
Is this normal? The driver is GB and has about GB of data on it, which I realize is rather large and may be the entire issue. If so, that's fine. I just wasn't expecting it and so thought I would ask. Seagate GB. I have experienced that issuing a reiserfsck --rebuild-tree command destroys almost everything and yes, it takes too much time.
If your data in that partition is not that important and you don't mind to lose it all , better re-format it. Remember that when dealing with partitions, your whole disk data is at risk. Find More Posts by raska. I don't remember it taking that long maybe hours? Reiserfsck has always worked for recovering my files, but lost a lot of filenames same with any other file recovery software, btw. The file names were the biggest part of the loss.
It will take time Find More Posts by Daga. As one of those parts was decoding, PAN got "stuck" decoding it. Not sure yet whether this was a bug in PAN or a physical defect on the part of the hard drive it was accessing.
PAN itself was still running, but the process that was decoding the file wouldn't finish and close the file. Neither could I kill it, either with signal 15 or 9.
I eventually had to take the radical option of forcing an umount so I could reboot. That borked the tree, which I assumed would happen. Last time something like that happened to me it was the harddrive going out. The drive would go from being mounted read-write to being read-only in the middle of a copy command, which confused programs and kernel alike.
Hope that isn't the problem I've always found that it's very important to first check your drive for damage before attempting to use something like Reiserfsck in one of its lower level repair modes. Most drive manufacturers have drive fitness tests that can be downloaded and burnt to a cdrom or dd'd to a floppy disk. Through practice, through rm delete data, we can detect reiserfs repair tool to recover, the recovery is under one hundred percent if the storage device without any problems, or the file system is not a bad block bad block in the case;.
I tested format the memory test equipment to recover lost reiserfs file system data, I practice in the mobile hard disk to do; for example, on my mobile hard disk is only one partition, and reiserfs file system is based on; I store a hundred M data, then use mkreiserfs or mkfs.
If then we find rebuilt hard disk partition file system misuse. Then reiserfs want to repair by the repair tool can restore most of the data; but not a hundred percent, sometimes a hundred percent successful, it depends on your luck;.
If I have this partition reiserfs file system format to another file system, and then if found to be erroneous, the probability of success on a very low; or mostly can not be successful;. If we take the hard drive's partition table was also rebuilt, if the next time you think of a mistake, the possibility of recovery reiserfs file system is also extremely low, or that they want to restore the success rate of zero by reiserfs file system tools; but sometimes more or less able to recover a little, or a long, long time to restore the previous data.
Oh, this thing is a little strange;. If you are due to re-partition data loss caused, first of all could you want to recover the partition table to its previous state, Windows may have the tools in this regard; the Linux system should also have such a tool, but they are commercial.
Good data recovery tool for Windows, it should also be commercial. We already said, data loss due to misuse rm command caused, and is able to recover most, or one hundred percent, which is the first case; Also, if the original hard disk partition is of reiserfs, because you misuse use mkreiserfs mkfs. If you are using a mobile storage, loss on reiserfs file system, you have direct use linux system you are currently using can be repaired, but must reiserfs file system support job.
Oh, this is not nonsense it? Reiserfs file system does not support Linux, my mobile hard disk with reiserfs what purpose. For example, your hard disk partition data loss is 9G, so you have to find at least have to find unused space is 10G hard disk or hard disk partition it; otherwise how can accommodate mirrored data loss it? So it is best to find a large-capacity hard disk or partition to prepare;.
If you're just lost in the hundreds of M mobile hard disk, it is not to find a place to accommodate up; this situation would be much easier;. You can also use the slackware first disc, after all the way to enter, appeared bash words, so OK; of course, you can also hang on the hard drive has a Linux machine up recovery, in short, the method is more; we are nothing more than With a reiserfs file system support Linux system to recover the data, we should understand this truth;.
The setup:. Is doing what I am doing the right way to go? Same happens every time, only the actual error message changes. Are there any chances I can somehow get the partitions to work again? It's a server to which I don't have physical access directly hosted server. Well, after a few more hours of reiserfsck ing it seems like repeating this three-step process.
I still don't know the cause for the problem as there seem to be no badblocks on any drive, neither do I know how much data is lost, but after all I am pretty sure that this should not happen. One partition is still "replaying its journal" but I will tell about the success or failure as soon as I can reboot the computer. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.
Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Asked 11 years, 9 months ago. Active 11 years, 3 months ago.
0コメント